In a 6-1 decision released Friday, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the state’s commercial activity tax (CAT) does not violate the constitutional prohibition of imposing an “excise tax upon the sale or purchase of food.”

This post was written by Jeffrey M. Nye.

This entry was posted on Sunday, September 20th, 2009 at 3:45 pm and is filed under Constitutional Law, Court Cases. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.