Two weeks ago we wrote that the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Clayborn may be a preview as to the Court’s willingness to strike down the Adam Walsh Act on ex post facto grounds.

This post was written by Jeffrey M. Nye.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 3rd, 2010 at 2:44 pm and is filed under Constitutional Law, Court Cases, Procedure. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.