The award is given to the mentor who

• Exemplifies and carries out the goals and objectives of the mentoring program
• Goes above and beyond the call of duty on behalf of your students
• Selflessly devotes time and energy to the singular goal of your student’s success – be it professional, academic or personal

Location: Hyde Park Country Club 3740 Erie Ave. Cincinnati OH 45208

RSVP: Peggy Gruenke peg@fssp-law.com or 513-533-2732

COST $25 includes CLE and Lunch

Topic: Ohio Public Records and Open Meeting Law

Presented by: Christopher P. Finney, Esq. and Curt Hartman, Esq.

Description of Event:  Overview of Statutes and Recent Cases; Ohio Public Records Law and Open Meeting Law – Practical utilization in your practice.

1:00 – 1:30 pm:   Lunch (Dine in or Carry-Out, whichever you prefer)

Creating an Effective Estate Plan, Guest speaker Patrick R. Veith, Esq.

This seminar will help you understand and make decisions around issues such as:

1. Do you need an estate plan
2. Helping to avoid probate
3. Who needs a will and what types can be effective
4. Common Pitfalls of estate plans

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/us/was-that-twitter-blast-false-or-just-honest-hyperbole.html?_r=2&hp

The prosecutor claimed that requesting and obtaining those records through a strawman and using Ohio’s public records statutes trigger reciprocal discovery under Criminal Rule of Procedure 16.  Rule 16 provides that when a criminal defendant makes a request in the criminal case for discovery from the prosecution, that in turn triggers a right in the prosecution for discovery from the defendant.

The City of Cincinnati argued successfully in Municipal Court that the public records request triggered reciprocal criminal discovery (even though the rule provides no such thing).  This week, Hamilton County’s First District Court of Appeals reversed that trial court finding, holding that the use of Ohio’s public records statute to obtain discovery relating to criminal cases does not trigger reciprocal discovery from the defendant, a major win for open records in Ohio.

The case is State of Ohio v. Athon, First Appellate District of Ohio Case No. C-110236 – 110239 (consolidated) and C – 110-290.

Background

Ohio is one of a handful of states with a statute punishing “false” political speech in the context of election campaigns (i.e., in the vast majority of jurisdictions, “free speech” reins and those aggrieved can rely upon common law defamation if they feel aggrieved).  

The position advanced by COAST is that the Ohio Elections Commission has failed to understand a proper role for regulating in the First Amendment arena, improperly making findings in cases dealing with those who participate in electoral campaigns and, indeed, punishing speech that is true, and defensible under the U.S. and Ohio constitutions.

COAST’s opponents filed a Complaint against certain “Tweets” of COAST tying streetcar spending to brownouts of fire departments.  They hoped for a last minute finding against COAST by the OEC and resulting negative press coverage over statements COAST contends are true in the closing days of the 2011 campaign. 

COAST sued in federal court to stop claimed unconstitutional interference in COAST’s free speech rights.  That case is pending before federal district court Judge Michael Barrett.

Actions of the Ohio Attorney General

The Ohio Attorney General is the statutory counsel of the Ohio Elections Commission, defending the OEC in that suit as is his obligation under the Ohio Constitution.  DeWine is also charged in his oath of office with defending the U.S. and Ohio Constitutions.  Thus, it seems he was in a bit of a quandary in defending such an obviously unconstitutional law, and its over-reaching enforcement by the OEC.

Well, this past week, in response to that dilemma, DeWine did a remarkable and brave thing — he filed an Amicus Brief pointing out to the Court the unconstitutionality of Ohio’s False Claims statute.  He is represented by preeminent First Amendment attorney Brad Smith, a former FEC Commissioner, to present this ground-breaking argument. Judge Barrett must still decide the issues in the case, but the trail has been blazed for him by the Attorney General.

Location: Hyde Park Country Club 3740 Erie Ave. Cincinnati OH 45208

RSVP: Peggy Gruenke peg@fssp-law.com or 513-533-2732

COST $25 includes CLE (1hr Ethics) and Lunch

Topic: Don’t Tweet That: How to be Ethical in a Social Media World

Presented by: Arpil Besl, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl

Description of Event:  A discussion regarding the ethical implications of using social media whether in day-to-day use by the practitioner, throughout the course of litigation, or even in negotiating transactions.   Ms. Besl will discuss how the traditional Model Rules of ethics are being interpreted when applied to social media by Ethics Boards and the Courts to help practitioners properly navigate the murky waters of today’s social media world.

1:00 – 1:30 pm:   Lunch (Dine in or Carry-Out, whichever you prefer)

Location: Hyde Park Country Club 3740 Erie Ave. Cincinnati OH 45208

RSVP: Peggy Gruenke peg@fssp-law.com or 513-533-2732

COST $25 includes CLE and Lunch

Topic: Environmental Law Hot Topics

Presented by:  Matthew G. Wagner, VP Client Relations,  Keramida, Inc

Vicki Keramida, Chief Technical Officer, CEO and Chairman, Keramida, In

The following are the main topics will be covered:

1. What is Vapor Intrusion
2. Compounds of Concern
3. Exposure Scenarios
4. How is Vapor Intrusion Measured
5. When do you worry about vapor intrusion
6. Screening levels for Vapor Intrusion pathway
7. Vapor in Soil
8. Vapors in Ground Water
9. Indoor Air Screening levels
10. Acceptable Human Health Risk
11. Vapor Intrusion Remediation Options

1:00 – 1:30 pm:   Lunch (Dine in or Carry-Out, whichever you prefer)